Turning Setbacks Into Comebacks
How Can We Help?
Proving Negligence in an Encino Personal Injury Claim
A negligence claim commonly requires evidence that another party was legally responsible for the injury.
This commonly involves demonstrating four key elements:
- Duty of care: The defendant was legally responsible for acting reasonably to prevent harm. For example, drivers must follow traffic laws, and property owners must maintain safe premises.
- Breach of duty: The defendant failed to uphold that duty through negligent or reckless behavior, such as speeding, failing to repair dangerous conditions, or ignoring safety protocols.
- Causation: The defendant’s breach must be connected to the injuries. This often requires evidence linking the defendant’s actions or failure to act to the harm suffered.
- Damages: The injured person must demonstrate actual losses, such as medical bills, lost income, property damage, or emotional distress, due to the incident.
The firm investigates each case to gather evidence, identify potentially liable parties, and develop support for the claim. Depending on the incident, that evidence may include medical records, photographs, witness statements, accident reports, employment records, video footage, or property records.
Accident & Injury Cases the Firm Handles
Different incidents raise different questions about insurance coverage, property ownership, employer responsibility, dangerous conditions, and causation.
The firm handles personal injury matters involving the following circumstances:
- Motor vehicle accidents: car, truck, motorcycle, and rideshare crashes may involve multiple drivers, commercial entities, or insurance policies.
- Bicycle and pedestrian accidents: These claims may require evidence concerning driver conduct, visibility, roadway conditions, and the nature of the injuries.
- Slip, trip, and fall claims: These matters may involve unsafe store conditions, defective walkways, inadequate warnings, or questions about who controlled the property.
- Premises liability: hazardous property conditions and negligent security can require records showing ownership, notice of the hazard, and opportunities to correct it.
- Dog bite and animal attacks: Medical documentation, photographs, witness accounts, and information about the animal may be relevant.
- Intentional injury matters: The firm handles sexual assault claims and sexual assault and abuse cases as well as domestic violence-related injury matters.
- Wrongful death cases: The firm also represents clients in wrongful death cases. These claims require a separate analysis of eligible claimants, compensable losses, evidence, and filing deadlines.
After identifying the responsible parties and developing the evidence, the firm can negotiate with the opposing parties. If settlement negotiations don’t resolve the matter, the firm can pursue civil litigation.
Trusted Advocacy, Proven Results.
Real Stories from Real Clients
-
Colleen O'Hara's dedication and strategic brilliance turned a life sentence into a second chance, proving her unmatched expertise in post-conviction relief and litigation.- Carlos I.
-
With gratitude and admiration, this client thanks Colleen O'Hara for her compassionate support and dedication, forever grateful for her heartfelt assistance.- Alejandra G.
-
Colleen O'Hara’s unwavering commitment and relentless efforts turned a difficult case into a victory, bringing freedom and joy back to this family.- Desiree O.
Compensation in an Encino Personal Injury Claim
An injured person may be entitled to several types of compensation under personal injury law.
The available damages depend on the evidence, the consequences of the injury, and the law that applies to the claim:
- Medical expenses: This includes costs for immediate emergency care, ongoing treatments, physical therapy, medications, and assistive devices.
- Lost wages and future earnings: If an injury prevents a person from working, the claim may seek compensation for lost income during recovery and diminished earning capacity in the future.
- Pain and suffering: This compensates for physical pain, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life caused by the injury.
- Punitive damages: This separate and limited category may be available when the defendant’s conduct meets the applicable legal standard. Punitive damages aren’t available in every injury case.
The firm evaluates the full scope of a client’s past, current, and reasonably anticipated losses when pursuing a claim.
California’s Pure Comparative Negligence Rule
Determining legal responsibility isn’t always a simple yes-or-no question. California generally follows a pure comparative negligence model, which means an injured person may pursue compensation even when assigned part of the responsibility. Any recovery can be reduced by that person’s percentage of fault.
How Fault Is Evaluated
Comparative-fault disputes can arise during negotiations or civil litigation, particularly when several drivers, property owners, employers, or other parties may share responsibility. The firm analyzes the available evidence and presents facts concerning each party’s role in the incident.
Fault may be divided among the parties involved and expressed as a percentage. Each party’s degree of responsibility can be assessed using witness statements, medical records, accident reports, photographs, video, vehicle data, and expert analysis when appropriate.
If percentages are assigned, compensation is adjusted downward to reflect the injured person’s share of responsibility for causing the accident.
Example of Comparative Fault
Suppose an injured person is involved in a car accident caused by a driver running a red light. However, the evidence shows that the injured person was speeding at the time, contributing to the collision’s severity. After the investigation, the other driver is determined to be 80% at fault, while the injured person is 20% at fault.
If the total damages amount to $100,000, the compensation would be reduced by the assigned percentage of fault. In this example, the injured person would receive 80% of the damages, or $80,000, instead of the full $100,000.
Addressing Disputed Fault
Because a disputed fault allocation can materially affect a claim, the firm examines reports, testimony, medical evidence, and other available records. The goal is to challenge unsupported fault allegations and present an evidence-based account of how the incident occurred.
